Aerospace & Defense
Turn maintenance records, imagery and engineering evidence into reviewable decisions.
Explore aircraft maintenance, imagery analysis and engineering support, with the operator, mission context and permitted actions defined for each workflow.
01Why AI now
Each figure links to its source.
Military AI market: $38.8B by 2028
MarketsandMarkets projected growth from $9.2 billion in 2023 to $38.8 billion in 2028.
Source: Military Embedded Systems
81% of A&D respondents use or plan AI/ML
A Deloitte survey found that 81% of aerospace and defense respondents already use or plan to use artificial intelligence and machine learning technology.
Source: Deloitte Insights
Aerospace AI skill demand: 30.8% CAGR to 2028
Deloitte forecasts demand for AI skills in U.S. aerospace product and parts manufacturing job postings will grow at a 30.8% CAGR from 2024 through 2028.
Source: Deloitte Insights
Start with a bounded evidence task such as finding a maintenance discrepancy or reviewing an image detection. Compare outputs with qualified reviewers and document missed findings, false alerts and operating conditions. Aircraft release and mission execution require their own authorized processes and validation.
02Capability map
Pick a domain to see its applications. Each one opens a full report.
Inside Defense Intelligence and Analysis
Applications in Defense Intelligence and Analysis
Share of the aerospace & defense use cases, by the kind of work the AI does.
Reasoning
Analyzes, predicts and decides: scoring, forecasting, classifying.
45%
Generation
Creates: text, images, code and other content.
29%
Agentic
Acts: plans, uses tools and completes multi-step tasks.
14%
Perception
Sees, hears and reads: documents, images, audio and video.
13%
Under 1% each: optimization.
03Workflow ideas
Atlas groups these applications by the changes they propose to a workflow. These preliminary classifications help you explore ideas; each application still needs a review of its sources and operating requirements.
Share of the 24 applications assigned a category.
Identify the inputs, the person responsible, and the decision or output the workflow must produce.
Look for source-backed details about the specific implementation, including its limits and human review.
Record the current baseline, agree on acceptance criteria, and test on representative cases before expanding.
04What gets built
Knowing when not to use one matters as much as knowing when to.
02 · 4 applications
AI pattern for interpreting and acting on images and video data.
03 · 4 applications
Simulation-Optimization combines computational simulation models with optimization algorithms to find optimal decisions under uncertainty and complex constraints. It runs many simulation scenarios to evaluate candidate solutions, using techniques like genetic algorithms, Bayesian optimization, or reinforcement learning.
Simulation-Optimization, in depth05The applications
The widest first, by the number of use cases each covers. Every report shows what changed, how it works, who has done it and what can go wrong.
Work with us
Reading every report still leaves the hardest question open: which move is worth funding first, here, given your constraints. That is the sprint: two weeks, fixed scope, and a candid answer either way.
Two weeks Fixed scope A candid fit-or-no-fit answer
A decision-ready shortlist scored against value, feasibility, evidence, risk, and time to proof.
A bounded operating design with actors, handoffs, data needs, controls, and success measures.
Build-versus-buy guidance, ROI assumptions, risk treatment, sequencing, and executive decisions.
06Rules & standards
Selected US and EU references for these workflows. Applicability depends on jurisdiction, organization, data and intended use. The planning notes are Atlas editorial guidance; they are not official implementation-time estimates or an exhaustive list of obligations.
Law or regulation
United States · covered defense articles, services and technical data
ITAR controls apply according to the article, service, technical data and transaction. Using an AI vendor does not remove export-control responsibilities; not all aerospace data is ITAR-controlled.
eCFR: 22 CFR Part 120, purpose and definitionsSource checked
Project planning note
Classify technical data and review vendor access, transfers and permitted processing before uploading it.
Agency guidance
United States · applicable aircraft certification projects
FAA AC 20-115D describes an acceptable means of showing compliance for airborne software, including use of DO-178C. It is not a blanket certification path for every AI component.
FAA: AC 20-115DSource checked
Project planning note
Agree the assurance basis and evidence needed for the specific airborne function with the certification team.
Your next step
Ask the workspace which move fits your company. Add your size, systems and constraints, and it works from these 32 applications to a plan your team can act on.
Rather talk it through? Book a 30-minute call