Threat Intelligence Ingestion and Investigation Copilot
Scales threat intelligence operations by ingesting and normalizing STIX, Sentinel, and other feeds, then supports agent-driven deep investigation for complex incidents beyond fixed playbooks.
The Problem
“Threat Intelligence Ingestion and Investigation Copilot”
Organizations face these key challenges:
Threat intelligence arrives in inconsistent formats across STIX/TAXII, Sentinel, CSV, JSON, email, and vendor APIs
Indicator deduplication and entity normalization are labor-intensive and error-prone
Analysts waste time pivoting across SIEM, EDR, TIP, case management, and external intel sources
Fixed SOAR playbooks break down for novel or multi-stage incidents
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Collect threat feeds from STIX/TAXII, Sentinel, vendor sources, and internal detections
- •Manually map fields, normalize indicators, and remove duplicate entities across sources
- •Pivot across SIEM, EDR, case records, and external intelligence sources during investigations
- •Apply static playbooks and analyst judgment to test hypotheses and document findings
Automation
Human Does
- •Set intelligence priorities, confidence thresholds, and investigation governance rules
- •Review AI-surfaced correlations, hypotheses, and recommended pivots for complex incidents
- •Approve high-impact investigation steps, response recommendations, and case conclusions
AI Handles
- •Ingest, classify, normalize, enrich, and deduplicate threat intelligence from heterogeneous sources
- •Maintain a unified knowledge layer of indicators, entities, relationships, provenance, and summaries
- •Retrieve evidence across connected security sources, recommend next investigative pivots, and summarize findings
- •Decompose complex incidents into investigation workstreams, test hypotheses iteratively, and draft analyst-ready reports
Operating Intelligence
How it works
AI surfaces what is hidden in the data.
Humans do the substantive investigation.
Closed cases sharpen future detection.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Scan
Step 2
Detect
Step 3
Assemble Evidence
Step 4
Investigate
Step 5
Act
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI scans and assembles evidence autonomously. Humans do the substantive investigation. Closed cases improve future scanning.
The Loop
6 steps
Scan
Scan broad data sources continuously.
Detect
Surface anomalies, links, or emerging signals.
Assemble Evidence
Pull related records into a working case file.
Investigate
Humans interpret evidence and make case judgments.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not approve containment, ticket closure, or any destructive response action without analyst judgment [S1].
Why this step is human
Investigative judgment involves ambiguity, legal considerations, and stakeholder impact that require human expertise.
Act
Carry out the human-directed next step.
Feedback
Closed investigations improve future detection.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Technologies
Technologies commonly used in Threat Intelligence Ingestion and Investigation Copilot implementations:
Key Players
Companies actively working on Threat Intelligence Ingestion and Investigation Copilot solutions:
Real-World Use Cases
Threat intelligence management at scale with STIX and Sentinel ingestion
It lets security teams import, create, search, and manage threat intel in a standard format so it can be used operationally across their security systems.
Agent-driven deep investigation for complex incidents
When a case is too messy for simple rules, an AI agent is asked to investigate by searching data, checking for persistence or lateral movement, and figuring out the bigger picture.