HOME/TECHNIQUE/Evaluation/Online evaluation

TECHNIQUE

Online evaluation

Evaluation

17APPLICATIONS
20OBSERVED OPERATORS
01

State of Practice

CROSS-VALIDATED — 3 OPERATORS

Online evaluation is observed as live/operational scoring, A/B-test readouts, and human-alignment checks rather than a single standard pattern.

Observed Practices

Use operational signals in evaluation: sampled production traffic, A/B-test rollout traffic, or recent peer-review outcomes.

3 of 3 operators with online-evaluation evidence in this pool.
DropboxCriteoAgoda

Continuously sample live production traffic and score it with the same metrics and logic used in offline suites.

1 of 3 operators with online-evaluation evidence in this pool.
Dropbox

Combine online production scoring with pre-merge and staging evaluation gates.

1 of 3 operators with online-evaluation evidence in this pool.
Dropbox

A/B test new models during rollout and report advertiser outcome uplift from phased deployment.

1 of 3 operators with online-evaluation evidence in this pool.
Criteo

Validate LLM workflow outputs against human analyst conclusions during peer review over a recent operating window.

1 of 3 operators with online-evaluation evidence in this pool.
Agoda

Where Operators Converge

Every cited operator evaluates against real operating behavior, but the measured signal differs by product: production traffic scores, A/B-test traffic, or human peer-review alignment.

Where Operators Diverge

What online signal is used as the evaluation unit.

APPROACH 01

Sampled live production traffic is scored with the same metrics and logic as offline suites.

Dropbox

APPROACH 02

New model behavior is evaluated through A/B testing and phased rollout impact on ROAS.

Criteo

APPROACH 03

LLM decisions are validated against human analyst conclusions during peer review.

Agoda

Who or what judges online behavior.

APPROACH 01

Automated scorers and judge-model style checks are used for answer quality, citation support, formatting, and tone.

Dropbox

APPROACH 02

Business-performance readouts from A/B testing and phased rollout are used.

Criteo

APPROACH 03

Human analyst conclusions in peer review are the comparison point.

Agoda

Watch Items

Live or changed traffic can expose quality/calibration failures: Dropbox reports pipeline tweaks can turn a prior good answer into a hallucination, while Criteo reports A/B testing new models can acquire different traffic on which the models are not calibrated.

For insufficient-context LLM cases, Agoda reports over-escalating and routing to human review rather than relying on the model verdict.

02

Implementation Menu

CURATED DEFAULTS
NameKindMaturity
A/B testing with guardrail metricspatternestablished
Implicit feedback capturepatterncommodity
Langfuse online scoringlibraryemerging
03

Observed in Production

17 APPS
ManufacturingCROSS-VALIDATED

Automated Quality Image Tagging and Cataloging

NVIDIA, Vyom Electronics2 OP
HealthcareGROUNDED

Radiology Triage and Report Dispatch Optimization

Artificial Intelligence in Breast Cancer Screening Program in Córdoba (AITIC)1 OP