SS7 and SIP Signaling Threat Detection
Monitors telecom signaling traffic to detect SS7 and SIP attacks that evade traditional billing-record-based security monitoring.
The Problem
“SS7 and SIP signaling-layer threat detection for telecom networks”
Organizations face these key challenges:
Trust-based SS7 architecture allows abuse by connected partners and intermediaries
SIP exposure on IP networks increases attack surface and event volume
Billing-record monitoring lacks message-level context and is too delayed for prevention
Static rules struggle with evolving attack patterns and partner-specific behavior
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Review CDR/FDR reports and signaling traces after incidents
- •Maintain static detection rules and thresholds for known abuse patterns
- •Investigate partner, trunk, and subscriber anomalies manually
- •Prioritize escalations based on customer impact, fraud exposure, and service disruption
Automation
- •Parse signaling and billing logs into searchable records
- •Apply fixed protocol signatures and threshold-based alerts
- •Aggregate event counts by source, destination, and message type
- •Generate basic alert queues and historical reports
Human Does
- •Approve containment actions for high-risk peers, routes, or subscriber segments
- •Decide incident severity, partner escalation, and response priorities
- •Handle ambiguous cases, false-positive disputes, and policy exceptions
AI Handles
- •Monitor SS7 and SIP signaling in near real time for protocol misuse and attack patterns
- •Learn behavioral baselines by subscriber, partner, route, trunk, and network element
- •Correlate multi-stage events into prioritized incidents with entity risk scoring
- •Recommend and optionally trigger approved response actions such as rate limits or blocking
Operating Intelligence
How it works
AI watches every signal continuously.
Humans investigate what it flags.
False positives train the next watch cycle.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Observe
Step 2
Classify
Step 3
Route
Step 4
Exception Review
Step 5
Record
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI observes and classifies continuously. Humans only engage on flagged exceptions. Corrections sharpen future detection.
The Loop
6 steps
Observe
Continuously take in operational signals and events.
Classify
Score, grade, or categorize what is coming in.
Route
Send routine items to the right path or queue.
Exception Review
Humans validate flagged edge cases and adjust standards.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not block a high-risk peer, route, or subscriber segment without human approval when the action could materially affect service [S1].
Why this step is human
Exception handling requires contextual reasoning and organizational judgment the model cannot reliably provide.
Record
Store outcomes and create the operating audit trail.
Feedback
Corrections and outcomes improve future performance.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Technologies
Technologies commonly used in SS7 and SIP Signaling Threat Detection implementations:
Key Players
Companies actively working on SS7 and SIP Signaling Threat Detection solutions: