Mining Demand Forecasting and Flotation Decision Support
AI-powered decision support that combines OT/IT data sharing, near-real-time analytics, and flotation setpoint optimization to improve mining demand forecasting, market responsiveness, and metal recovery under changing operating conditions.
The Problem
“Mining demand forecasting and flotation decision support using OT/IT data fusion and AI optimization”
Organizations face these key challenges:
OT historian, lab, maintenance, ERP, and commercial data are fragmented across systems
Plant decisions are based on delayed reports rather than current operating conditions
Flotation performance changes with ore variability, reagent response, and equipment condition
Manual setpoint tuning is inconsistent across shifts and operators
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Collect historian, lab, ERP, and sales data from separate reports and spreadsheets
- •Review flotation performance, ore changes, and tails results during shift or daily meetings
- •Manually tune rougher pull rate and related flotation settings based on operator and metallurgist judgment
- •Create short-horizon production and demand forecasts using periodic planning inputs
Automation
Human Does
- •Approve or reject recommended flotation setpoint changes within operating limits
- •Choose production and demand response actions based on forecast scenarios and plant constraints
- •Handle exceptions when recommendations conflict with safety, maintenance, or shift priorities
AI Handles
- •Fuse OT, lab, ERP, sales, and market signals into a near-real-time operating view
- •Monitor flotation, throughput, and forecast indicators for abnormal patterns and emerging losses
- •Predict short-horizon production, concentrate outcomes, and demand scenarios under current conditions
- •Recommend flotation setpoint adjustments to balance recovery, grade, and tails loss
Operating Intelligence
How it works
AI runs the first three steps autonomously.
Humans own every decision.
The system gets smarter each cycle.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Assemble Context
Step 2
Analyze
Step 3
Recommend
Step 4
Human Decision
Step 5
Execute
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI handles assembly, analysis, and execution. The human gate sits at the decision point. Every cycle refines future recommendations.
The Loop
6 steps
Assemble Context
Combine the relevant records, signals, and constraints.
Analyze
Evaluate options, risk, and likely outcomes.
Recommend
Present a ranked recommendation with supporting rationale.
Human Decision
A human accepts, edits, or rejects the recommendation.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not change flotation setpoints without operator or metallurgist approval. [S3]
Why this step is human
The decision carries real-world consequences that require professional judgment and accountability.
Execute
Carry out the approved action in the operating workflow.
Feedback
Outcome data improves future recommendations.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Real-World Use Cases
AI decision support for Cu/Au flotation circuit setpoint optimisation
The system watches plant data in real time and tells operators how to adjust flotation settings so less valuable metal is lost to waste.
Enterprise OT/IT data sharing with AI-powered analytics
The system sends plant-floor data to business dashboards so executives and analysts can see what is happening almost immediately and use AI to spot patterns and improve decisions.
AVEVA™ Documentation
The provided page is a documentation search/navigation shell, not a description of an AI workflow.