LLM Application Vulnerability Assessment and Runtime Protection
Assesss and mitigates security risks in LLM applications across development and runtime, aligning controls to known LLM vulnerability categories and protecting deployed apps from emerging threats.
The Problem
“LLM Application Vulnerability Assessment and Runtime Protection”
Organizations face these key challenges:
Security teams lack LLM-specific testing coverage beyond standard AppSec tools
Developers ship prompts, agents, and retrieval pipelines without clear threat models
Runtime attacks can arrive through user input, retrieved documents, plugins, or tools
Manual red teaming does not scale across frequent prompt and model changes
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Review LLM application designs and identify likely security risks manually
- •Run periodic security checks before release and document findings
- •Prioritize remediation work and decide release readiness
- •Investigate incidents and update controls after issues are found
Automation
- •Execute standard code and dependency scans
- •Apply predefined security rules and alert on known issues
- •Collect logs and security events for analyst review
Human Does
- •Approve security policies, risk thresholds, and release exceptions
- •Review high-severity findings and decide remediation priorities
- •Authorize containment actions for sensitive runtime incidents
AI Handles
- •Continuously assess LLM applications against known vulnerability categories
- •Run adversarial testing and surface prioritized weaknesses before release
- •Monitor prompts, retrieved content, outputs, and tool use for runtime threats
- •Enforce runtime protections by blocking, filtering, or containing unsafe behavior
Operating Intelligence
How it works
AI watches every signal continuously.
Humans investigate what it flags.
False positives train the next watch cycle.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Observe
Step 2
Classify
Step 3
Route
Step 4
Exception Review
Step 5
Record
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI observes and classifies continuously. Humans only engage on flagged exceptions. Corrections sharpen future detection.
The Loop
6 steps
Observe
Continuously take in operational signals and events.
Classify
Score, grade, or categorize what is coming in.
Route
Send routine items to the right path or queue.
Exception Review
Humans validate flagged edge cases and adjust standards.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not approve release exceptions without a security lead's judgment [S1].
Why this step is human
Exception handling requires contextual reasoning and organizational judgment the model cannot reliably provide.
Record
Store outcomes and create the operating audit trail.
Feedback
Corrections and outcomes improve future performance.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Technologies
Technologies commonly used in LLM Application Vulnerability Assessment and Runtime Protection implementations:
Key Players
Companies actively working on LLM Application Vulnerability Assessment and Runtime Protection solutions: