AI Productive Use Energy
The Problem
“Unlocking reliable productive energy for SMEs”
Organizations face these key challenges:
Poor visibility into productive-use load profiles causes chronic under/over-sizing and unreliable service
Revenue leakage from irregular payments, non-technical losses, and weak customer credit assessment
High O&M burden from reactive maintenance and inefficient field dispatch across dispersed sites
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Conduct manual customer surveys and site visits to estimate productive-use demand
- •Size systems and set tariffs using spreadsheet models and rule-of-thumb assumptions
- •Review payment histories and customer complaints to decide collections and service actions
- •Dispatch field teams reactively for outages, maintenance, and meter or asset checks
Automation
- •No AI-driven forecasting or customer segmentation is used
- •No automated anomaly detection for losses, outages, or equipment degradation is performed
- •No predictive maintenance or prioritized dispatch recommendations are generated
Human Does
- •Approve system sizing, tariff, and financing decisions for customer segments and sites
- •Review high-risk accounts, suspected losses, and service exceptions before escalation
- •Authorize maintenance priorities, field interventions, and customer outreach actions
AI Handles
- •Forecast productive-use demand and load growth by customer, site, and feeder or microgrid
- •Segment customers and recommend suitable technologies, tariffs, and financing offers
- •Monitor smart meter, payment, and asset telemetry data to detect losses, arrears, and faults
- •Prioritize maintenance and field dispatch using outage risk and equipment health signals
Operating Intelligence
How AI Productive Use Energy runs once it is live
AI runs the first three steps autonomously.
Humans own every decision.
The system gets smarter each cycle.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Assemble Context
Step 2
Analyze
Step 3
Recommend
Step 4
Human Decision
Step 5
Execute
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI handles assembly, analysis, and execution. The human gate sits at the decision point. Every cycle refines future recommendations.
The Loop
6 steps
Assemble Context
Combine the relevant records, signals, and constraints.
Analyze
Evaluate options, risk, and likely outcomes.
Recommend
Present a ranked recommendation with supporting rationale.
Human Decision
A human accepts, edits, or rejects the recommendation.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not approve system sizing, tariff changes, or financing terms for a customer segment or site without review by an authorized program or operations lead. [S1][S2]
Why this step is human
The decision carries real-world consequences that require professional judgment and accountability.
Execute
Carry out the approved action in the operating workflow.
Feedback
Outcome data improves future recommendations.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Real-World Use Cases
Computer vision robotic inspection in nuclear power plants
Robots with cameras and AI inspect dangerous nuclear areas so people do not have to go in, and the system spots tiny cracks faster than manual checks.
Optimization model for EV integration and battery storage to achieve site energy autonomy
An AI-enabled optimization system decides when a site should charge electric vehicles, use on-site batteries, and rely on local generation so the building can cover more of its own energy needs and reduce grid dependence.
AI-assisted grid congestion management
Use AI to help power-grid operators spot and manage overloaded lines before they become bigger problems.