Crop Disease Spray Decision Support
Detects crop disease and related field health threats from sensor, imaging, and geospatial data to guide targeted spraying, fungicide trial evaluation, field scenario testing, and traceable response actions across farm operations.
The Problem
“Crop disease detection and precision spray decision support for field operations”
Organizations face these key challenges:
Manual scouting is slow, inconsistent, and expensive at field scale
Disease symptoms, weed pressure, and abiotic stress are easily confused in early stages
Machine, imagery, weather, and geospatial data are fragmented across vendors and formats
Spray decisions are often blanket recommendations with poor spatial precision
Impact When Solved
The Shift
Human Does
- •Walk fields and review imagery, machine logs, and weather reports to spot disease, weeds, or stress
- •Judge threat severity by field and decide broad spray or fungicide actions
- •Track treated versus untreated trials in spreadsheets and compare outcomes manually
- •Coordinate operators on where and when to spray and record actions after application
Automation
Human Does
- •Approve spray recommendations, fungicide actions, and trial plans for each field
- •Review flagged exceptions where disease, weed pressure, or abiotic stress is uncertain
- •Set treatment priorities, operational constraints, and traceability requirements across farms
AI Handles
- •Monitor imagery, sensor, weather, and geospatial inputs to detect disease, weeds, and related field threats early
- •Score severity by zone, generate geolocated spray maps, and trigger selective spray or section-control recommendations
- •Track detections, treatments, and outcomes in a traceable event history across field operations and handoffs
- •Simulate field scenarios and compare treated versus untreated results to recommend timing and product strategies
Operating Intelligence
How Crop Disease Spray Decision Support runs once it is live
AI runs the first three steps autonomously.
Humans own every decision.
The system gets smarter each cycle.
Who is in control at each step
Each column marks the operating owner for that step. AI-led actions sit above the divider, human decisions and feedback loops sit below it.
Step 1
Assemble Context
Step 2
Analyze
Step 3
Recommend
Step 4
Human Decision
Step 5
Execute
Step 6
Feedback
AI lead
Autonomous execution
Human lead
Approval, override, feedback
AI handles assembly, analysis, and execution. The human gate sits at the decision point. Every cycle refines future recommendations.
The Loop
6 steps
Assemble Context
Combine the relevant records, signals, and constraints.
Analyze
Evaluate options, risk, and likely outcomes.
Recommend
Present a ranked recommendation with supporting rationale.
Human Decision
A human accepts, edits, or rejects the recommendation.
Authority gates · 1
The system must not release a spray action, fungicide treatment, or trial plan without agronomist or farm operations approval. [S1][S5][S8]
Why this step is human
The decision carries real-world consequences that require professional judgment and accountability.
Execute
Carry out the approved action in the operating workflow.
Feedback
Outcome data improves future recommendations.
1 operating angles mapped
Operational Depth
Real-World Use Cases
Geolocated spray decision mapping and section control
AI watches the field, marks where weeds are located on a map, and helps the sprayer turn sections on or off in the right places.
Low-/No-Cost Food Supply Chain Traceability Challenge Solutions
Create affordable digital tools that let food companies track where food came from and where it went, so contaminated products can be found faster.
Radio-frequency and AI-based rapid HPAI diagnostic device
Create a fast test device that uses radio-frequency sensing plus AI to tell if poultry may have highly pathogenic avian influenza.
IntelliSense selective weed spraying on Guardian front-boom sprayers
Cameras on the sprayer look ahead in the field, detect weeds and crop conditions, and turn specific nozzles on or off so chemicals are sprayed only where needed.
Field-scale treated-vs-untreated fungicide trial for drought-stressed corn
A farmer sprayed fungicide on one clearly marked part of a corn field and left another part unsprayed, then compared harvest results to see if the spray really helped.