ConstructionAgentic-ReActExperimental

DAG-based LLM Fault Diagnosis Evaluation Framework

Think of this as a detailed troubleshooting decision tree for machines that an AI must follow and be graded on. The decision tree (a DAG) encodes expert fault-finding steps; the LLM tries to diagnose faults using sensor data and descriptions; the framework checks how well the AI followed the steps and reached the right cause, providing a rigorous way to test and improve AI-based maintenance assistants.

8.0
Quality
Score

Executive Brief

Business Problem Solved

Provides a structured, engineering-grade way to evaluate whether an LLM-based maintenance assistant can correctly diagnose equipment faults and follow prescribed troubleshooting paths, instead of relying on ad-hoc or subjective assessments.

Value Drivers

Objective measurement of LLM performance in industrial fault diagnosis tasksSafer deployment of AI assistants in maintenance by stress-testing reasoning pathsAbility to compare different models or configurations using the same DAG-based test benchFaster iteration on prompts and workflows guided by clear diagnostic accuracy metrics

Strategic Moat

Domain-specific DAG representations of fault trees and evaluation metrics tailored to L-DED and similar industrial maintenance workflows.

Technical Analysis

Model Strategy

Hybrid

Data Strategy

Context Window Stuffing

Implementation Complexity

High (Custom Models/Infra)

Scalability Bottleneck

Building and maintaining accurate DAGs of fault trees and labeled evaluation scenarios; evaluation cost grows with number of scenarios and model variants tested.

Technology Stack

Market Signal

Adoption Stage

Early Adopters

Differentiation Factor

Uses directed acyclic graphs that mirror industrial fault trees as the backbone for evaluating LLM reasoning in diagnostics, going beyond simple question–answer accuracy tests or generic benchmark datasets.